Deceitful Sahajist (John Noyce) joins horny, porny Sfacets incivility at Wikipedia
User talk: Sahajhist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you have used multiple accounts
abusively, see user:WikiPossum and user:MonitorMan. I would warn you
that any repetition of this behaviour may lead to an immediate block
from further editing. Guy (Help!) 12:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Sahajhist is my old ID. MonitorMan is my new ID. Sahajhist 13:15, 9
December 2007 (UTC)
I see you've blocked my new ID indefinately so its back to the old
one. Tiresome. Sahajhist 15:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
"Old ID"? Monitorman began editing on November 19, 2007[1] (by
participating in a thread to which Sahajhist had already contributed
[2]). Since then "Sahajhist" has made 23 edits, not including
today's. Changing usernames is OK, using multiple ones at the same
time in the same articles is not.
Sahajhist 12:45, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (revert -
really Simon!)
58.109.99.153 14:39, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt
(yawn))
WikiPossum 15:04, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt -
no yawn)
Please remember that the rule is "one editor, one account". Please
read and comply with WP:SOCK. Using multiple accounts to participate
in a mediation,[3], to make snide remarks,[4][5], to promote yourself
[6], or to disrupt an RfC[7] is just plain deceitful. ·:· Will Beback
·:· 20:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
you have been busy. Do you have a life in the real world? (still
posting as)Sahajhist 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sahajhist"
Dear self-realized souls,
It looks like Sahajist (John Noyce) is as deceitful as Sfacets is
horny and porny. John Noyce has always used multiple IDs to mislead
others - ALWAYS! That is his deceitful way of "loading the dice" in
his favor. He has no qualms about being dishonest as it is not easy
to get caught on the Internet. But folks, he is against guys who are
internet savvy and have tools like CheckUser to nail cheats. And when
Will Beback nailed him John Noyce could only pathetically lash back.
i have claimed in previous posts that John Noyce uses multiple IDs to
deceive the unsuspecting. So i will be archiving this Wikipedia
article as evidence of what i have known for years.
This whole Sahajist and Sfacets Wikipedia adventure is turning out
into a fiasco. It is a shame that compared to deceitful Sahajist and
horny, porny Sfacets, ordinary folks like Will Beback are acting far
more honestly and morally. How come more than two decades of SY
meditation, footsoaking and treatments cannot rid WCASY approved John
Noyce of such negativity? And what can i say of Sfacets?
Just a few days ago on Dec. 5, 2007 John Noyce had the temerity (and
lack of both intelligence and judgment) to defend his horny, porny
pal Sfacets. He sent Violet an email:
>
> 2. If you look more carefully at sfacets' bittorrent
> upload page, you'll see that what Jagbir is objecting
> to in his usual colourful language are in fact
> adverts. These adverts have absolutely nothing to do
> with sfacets whatsoever. Check it for yourself. I'd
> say Jagbir needs to apologise for jumping to
> conclusions.
>
i waited for nearly a week to positively confirm John Noyce's lack of
both intelligence and judgment about his horny, porny friend Sfacets.
Instead of asking Sfacets to remove his links from this X-rated page
http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets
John Noyce is asking an apology from me???!!!! Both John Noyce and
Sfacets do not have the common sense and shame to do what any
self-realized soul would do - remove all links at that X-rated page. As
far as John Noyce is concerned "These adverts have absolutely nothing
to do with sfacets whatsoever." In other words, those obscene X-
rated images should in no way reflect on Sfacets or his state of self-
realization. Since that is the case John Noyce, how about advertising
Sahaja Yoga at bittorrent with a nice photo of Shri Mataji? i think
Sfacets has space for that on his XXX-advertments web-page.
regards to all,
jagbir
>
> Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the
> Savior: "I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting the
> links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity from
> receiving your message of the Last Judgment."
>
> Hope that makes your day Sfacets,
>
> jagbir
>
>
> Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived at
> http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations will
> know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri Mataji's
> life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i would
> value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.
>
And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at Wikipedia which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the good Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely WCASY will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you .......... or at least with John Noyce.
But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too, that disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-old roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us to watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?
http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets
Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John Noyce. So when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish The Kama Sutra of Sahaja Yoga?
jagbir
Horny and porny Sfacets blocked 31 hrs for incivility at Wikipedia
>
> Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the
> Savior: "I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting the
> links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity from
> receiving your message of the Last Judgment."
>
> Hope that makes your day Sfacets,
>
> jagbir
>
>
> Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived at
> http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations will
> know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri Mataji's
> life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i would
> value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.
>
And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at Wikipedia
which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the good
Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely WCASY
will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you .......... or
at least with John Noyce.
But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too, that
disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-old
roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us to
watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?
http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets
Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John Noyce. So
when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish The Kama
Sutra of Sahaja Yoga?
jagbir
3RR
You have violated 3RR on the Meditation page. I will give you an
opportunity to self revert before reporting your violation. Gatoclass
13:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I have already done so. Meanwhile please explain. Sfacets 13:45, 4
December 2007 (UTC)
I left a comment on the article mainpage. Gatoclass 14:36, 4 December
2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked 31 hrs for incivility in edit summary and 3RR gaming
I have blocked you from editing for 31 hours for edit warring on
Meditation and for this edit summary: [1], in which you describe
another editors changes as "pathetic".
Reviewing the AN/I thread, it should be clear to you by now that your
actions are seen as outside the reasonable norm for behavior of
Wikipedia editors. Regardless of whether your editorial contributions
are truthful and in line with Wikipedia policy, your behavior and way
of making them has been widely unacceptable for some time now.
If you want to continue contributing to the project, please do so in
a responsible and respectful manner. I recommend that you re-read
WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL, and along the way WP:NPOV and WP:COI regarding
what you're editing and how.
If you continue to antagonize people and violate our policies you and
any sockpuppet accounts will end up blocked from editing the site.
That is unnecessary and unfortunate. It's entirely up to you whether
you will change your behavior into that of a positive contributor and
avoid that fate or not. I hope you will take these warnings and learn
from them and behave.
Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sfacets
www.sahajayoga-shrimataji.org
Sahaja Yoga Archives
Shakti/Last Judgment/Qiyamah Archives
www.adishakti.org
